1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 68 Ohio
  5. 68 Ohio St.3d 478 (1994)
 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CAMERA

No. 93-2180.

68 Ohio St.3d 478 (1994)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CAMERA.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 23, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geoffrey Stern, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harold Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Mark H. Aultman, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board. However, we indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law without credit for time served. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C. J., A.W. SWEENEY, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

DOUGLAS, J., dissents.

DOUGLAS, J., dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. I would concur with the recommendations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases