1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 442 S.E.2d
  5. 442 S.E.2d 104 (1994)
 

DENNIS v. DUKE POWER CO.

No. 9310UC278.

442 S.E.2d 104 (1994)

114 N.C.App. 272

In the Matter of Mrs. Delora DENNIS, Route 2, Box 478, Brevard, North Carolina 28712, and Other Customers of Haywood Electric Membership Corporation, Complainants, v. DUKE POWER COMPANY and Haywood Electric Membership Corporation, Respondents, Mr. Thomas W. McGOHEY and Other Customers of Haywood Electric Membership Corporation, 505 Connestee Trail, Brevard, North Carolina, 28712, Complainants, v. DUKE POWER COMPANY and Haywood Electric Membership Corporation, Respondents. Mrs. Carmeletta MOSES, Route 68, Box 326, Tuckasegee, North Carolina 28783, Complainant, v. DUKE POWER COMPANY and Haywood Electric Membership Corporation, Respondents, and Mr. Forrest Cole, Route 63, Bull Pen Road, Cashiers, North Carolina 28717, and Other Customers of Haywood Electric Membership Corporation, Complainants, and Nantahala Power & Light Company and Haywood Electric Membership Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 19, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, by Jerry W. Amos, Greensboro, for respondent-appellant Haywood Elec. Membership Corp.

Victoria O. Hauser, Staff Atty., and A.W. Turner, Jr., Staff Atty., Raleigh, for intervenor-appellant Public Staff.

Thomas K. Austin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Raleigh, for intervenor-appellant North Carolina Elec. Membership Corp.

Steve C. Griffith, Jr., Executive Vice President and Gen. Counsel, William Larry Porter, Associate Gen. Counsel, Karol P. Mack, Sr. Atty., and Kennedy, Covington, Lobdell & Hickman by Myles E. Standish, Charlotte, for respondent-appellee Duke Power Co.

Hunton & Williams by Edward S. Finley, Jr. and James L. Hunt, Charlotte, for respondent-appellee Nantahala Power & Light Company.

EAGLES, Judge.

On the appeals of respondent Haywood EMC and intervenors NCEMC and the Public Staff, the questions presented are whether the Commission erred in: (1) failing to render its decision pursuant to the standards set forth in G.S. 62-79(a), thereby frustrating appellate review; (2) reassigning complainant M-B Industries, the manufacturing company, from Haywood EMC to Duke; (3) failing to reassign the residential complainants to an electric supplier other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases