1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 209 A.D.2d
  5. 209 A.D.2d 337 (1994)
 

ZLETZ v. WETANSON

209 A.D.2d 337 (1994)

618 N.Y.S.2d 782

Richard Zletz, Respondent, v. Herbert Wetanson et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Richard Zletz, Individually and on Behalf of Defendant Corporations, Respondent, v. Hisae Vilca et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 22, 1994

Though the causes of action in each complaint are "unfocused" and "rambling", making it difficult to distill the claims that are alleged, certain claims can be dismissed since plaintiff does not controvert defendants' contention that they are without legal basis. New York does not recognize a conspiracy tort, plaintiff has not detailed a claim based on fraud and plaintiff has not shown that his purported shareholders' derivative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases