Defendant argues that once he made certain payments under the parties' February 1991 stipulation discontinuing the first foreclosure action, the mortgage and note were reinstated, including the requirement of written notice of an election to accelerate, which he was not given prior to the institution of this second foreclosure action. We disagree.
The stipulation clearly stated that plaintiff retained the "right to accelerate the mortgage and to commence an action...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
