OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RICH

No. 93-2517.

69 Ohio St.3d 470 (1994)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RICH.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 22, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geoffrey Stern, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Respondent filed objections to the findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations of the board, arguing that the facts do not warrant a finding of a violation of DR 7-104(A)(2), which states:

"(A) During the course of his representation of a client a lawyer shall not: "* * *

"(2) Give advice to a person who is not represented by a lawyer, other than advice to secure counsel, if the interests of such person are or have a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases