SLOWINSKI v. COUNTY OF MONMOUTH


272 N.J. Super. 264 (1994)

639 A.2d 1112

JOSEPH P. SLOWINSKI AND STACEY C. SLOWINSKI, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, A MUNICIPAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 24, 1994.

Reconsideration Granted February 17, 1994..

Reargued March 2, 1994.

Decided April 15, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gertrude E. Slowinski, argued the cause for appellants (Mrs. Slowinski on the brief).

William J. O'Hagan, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Stout & O'Hagan, attorneys; Mr. O'Hagan of counsel; Barbara L. Birdsall on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL, LONG and LANDAU.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs, Joseph P. Slowinski and Stacey C. Slowinski, filed an action in the Chancery Division to enjoin defendant, County of Monmouth, from implementing a road-widening of County Route 537 which passes in front of plaintiffs' eighteenth-century home. Defendant was granted summary judgment. Plaintiffs appeal the grant of summary judgment to the County,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases