Although there were minor inconsistencies in some of the testimony, and the beer served in cups could not be traced by either the underage patrons or the undercover officers to a particular tap in an establishment that also served non-alcoholic beer, there was nonetheless substantial evidence to sustain respondent's findings. Several underage patrons identified the beer they were served by brand name, one testified that she was served beer in a bottle, and several persons...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
