1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 520 N.W.2d
  5. 520 N.W.2d 4 (1994)
 

PATTON v. NEWMAR CORP.

No. C8-93-2546.

520 N.W.2d 4 (1994)

Mary PATTON, et al., Appellants, v. NEWMAR CORPORATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted September 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William O. Bongard, Wilbur W. Fluegel, Sieben, Grose, Von Holtum, McCoy & Carey, Ltd., Minneapolis, for appellants.

Stephen J. Foley, Bryan K. McKamey, Foley & Mansfield, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by FORSBERG, P.J., and LANSING and DAVIES, JJ.

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Respondent Newmar Corporation moved for summary judgment and the exclusion of Mary and Richard Patton's expert witness's testimony because the Pattons and their agents failed to preserve the remains of the motor home they allege was defectively designed. The district court sanctioned the Pattons by completely excluding their expert witness's testimony and then granting summary judgment in favor of Newmar. We reverse and remand.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases