1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 205 A.D.2d
  5. 205 A.D.2d 316 (1994)
 

RICH v. HACKEL

205 A.D.2d 316 (1994)

613 N.Y.S.2d 5

Denise J. Rich, Appellant, v. Alexander R. Hackel et al., Defendants, and Clarendon, Ltd., et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 2, 1994

While we do not pass on the issue of whether plaintiff has standing to maintain the causes of action asserted in the complaint, it is clear that the IAS Court's denial of plaintiff's cross-motion to disqualify the law firm of Varet & Fink ("VF") from representing the Clarendon defendants in this lawsuit was an exercise of sound discretion (see, Juergens v Schanman, 182 A.D.2d 740

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases