KREIZEL v. KREIZEL


201 A.D.2d 318 (1994)

608 N.Y.S.2d 832

James Kreizel, Respondent-Appellant, v. Robyn Kreizel, Appellant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 8, 1994


The award for maintenance should have been made retroactive to the date of the first application therefor (Sotiropoulos v Sotiropoulos, 181 A.D.2d 499). The amount of credit due plaintiff for past payments (see, Berge v Berge, 159 A.D.2d 960, 961) cannot be determined on this record, particularly given the absence of a decision on defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases