JANE DOE v. FIFE MUNICIPAL COURT

No. 16203-2-II.

74 Wn. App. 444 (1994)

874 P.2d 182

JANE DOE, ET AL, Appellants, v. FIFE MUNICIPAL COURT, ET AL, Respondents. JANE ROE, ET AL, Appellants, v. TACOMA MUNICIPAL COURT, ET AL, Respondents. JOHN DOE, ET AL, Appellants, v. PUYALLUP MUNICIPAL COURT, ET AL, Respondents. JOHN ROE, ET AL, Appellants, v. PIERCE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

June 2, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Abolofia, Gary M. Clower, and John A. Strait, for appellants.

Michael C. Walter and Keating, Bucklin & McCormack, for respondents Puyallup.

William Barker, City Attorney, and Joseph M. Diaz, Assistant, for respondents Tacoma.

John W. Ladenburg, Prosecuting Attorney, and Douglas W. Vanscoy, Deputy, for respondents Pierce.

Scott A. Kallander, John P. Erlick, and Cozen & O'Connor, for respondents Fife.


ALEXANDER, J.

John Doe, Jane Roe, John Roe, and Jane Doe (Does)1 appeal an order of the Pierce County Superior Court granting summary judgment to various courts of limited jurisdiction and governmental entities (Limited Courts), dismissing the Does' claims against the Limited Courts for recovery of "court costs" the Does paid as a condition of deferred prosecution. We affirm.

The Does were charged in various Pierce County courts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases