1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 271 N.J.
  5. 271 N.J. Super. 241 (1994)
 

KALI BARI TEMPLE v. BOARD OF ADJ.

271 N.J. Super. 241 (1994)

638 A.2d 839

KALI BARI TEMPLE AND BIRENDA NATH GANGULY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 2, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert Cohn argued the cause for appellants (Cohn, Lifland, Pearlman, Herrman & Knopf. attorneys; Terri Del Greco, of counsel, and Allen Susser, on the brief).

Donald K. Moore argued the cause for respondent (Kelleher & Moore, attorneys; Mr. Moore, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL, LONG and LANDAU.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LANDAU, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Birenda Nath Ganguly (Ganguly) and the Kali Bari Temple (Temple) appeal from a Law Division judgment affirming the denial of their application for a dual use variance under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70d, a bulk variance under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70c and certain site plan approvals by defendant-respondent Board of Adjustment of Readington Township ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases