SCOTT v. KNOBLOCK


204 A.D.2d 299 (1994)

611 N.Y.S.2d 265

Louise Scott, Respondent, v. Arthur L. Knoblock et al., Defendants, and David Selby, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 2, 1994


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion to vacate the order dated February 18, 1992, is denied, the order dated February 18, 1992, is reinstated, and the complaint, as asserted against the appellant, is dismissed.

The due diligence requirement of CPLR 308 (4) should be strictly observed, given the reduced likelihood that a summons served pursuant to that section will be received (see

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases