1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 123 Wn.2d
  5. 123 Wn.2d 376 (1994)
 

RESPONSIBLE URBAN GROWTH GROUP v. CITY OF KENT

No. 58990-9.

123 Wn.2d 376 (1994)

868 P.2d 861

RESPONSIBLE URBAN GROWTH GROUP, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF KENT, Defendant, S.D.M. PROPERTIES, ET AL, Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

As amended by order May 17, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger M. Leed (of Roger M. Leed, P.S.), for appellants.

Peter J. Eglick & Associates, by Peter J. Eglick and Bob C. Sterbank, for respondent.

[As amended by order of the Supreme Court May 17, 1994.]

MADSEN, J.

This court granted appellant S.D.M. Properties (SDM) direct review of a King County Superior Court judgment invalidating a City of Kent (City) zoning ordinance and voiding a building permit issued to SDM under that ordinance. SDM contends that the City's adoption of the ordinance met all notice requirements, and that the trial court improperly voided the permit. We reject these contentions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases