U.S. v. NEELY

No. 93-55232.

38 F.3d 458 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Lee NEELY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 20, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Lee Neely, pro se.

John R. Kraemer, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Diego, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWNING, BEEZER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

We consider the effect of subsequent changes in Title 18 of the United States Code on our holding in United States v. Myers, 451 F.2d 402 (9th Cir.1972), that a federal defendant subject to state prosecution can enter a federal guilty plea knowingly and intelligently only if he or she has been informed that the court lacks authority to impose a sentence to be served concurrently with any state sentence subsequently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases