1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 136 N.J.
  5. 136 N.J. 356 (1994)
 

STATE v. PULASTY

136 N.J. 356 (1994)

642 A.2d 1392

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LOUIS PULASTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martha A. Suhayda-Vogt and John L. Pritchard argued the cause for appellant (Ms. Suhayda-Vogt, Mr. Pritchard, and Harold Kamens, attorneys).

Hilary L. Brunell, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (James F. Mulvihill, Acting Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

Defendant pleaded guilty to second-degree theft by deception. The trial court ordered him to make restitution to his employer. On defendant's appeal the Appellate Division affirmed, and we granted certification, 133 N.J. 430, 627 A.2d 1136 (1993). Substantially for the reasons set forth in the Appellate Division opinion, see 259 N.J.Super. 274, 612 A.2d 952

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases