1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 201 A.D.2d
  5. 201 A.D.2d 287 (1994)
 

SEEDMAN v. BONDY & SCHLOSS

201 A.D.2d 287 (1994)

608 N.Y.S.2d 832

George J. Seedman et al., Respondents, v. Bondy & Schloss, Appellant, and Kaplan & Kaplan, Respondent Magdalena Titus, Respondent, v. Lewis M. Schwartz et al., Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Kaplan & Kaplan, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 3, 1994

Upon comparing the allegations of the complaints in the two actions, we find that defendants' valuations and reporting of the leaseholds in question and the effect thereof on the tax liability of the plaintiffs in both actions is a central and common issue to both actions, and that defendants-appellants' opposition to consolidation does not demonstrate prejudice to a substantial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases