1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 34 F.3d
  5. 34 F.3d 453 (1994)
 

NICOLET INSTRUMENT CORP. v. LINDQUIST & VENNUM

No. 93-3822.

34 F.3d 453 (1994)

NICOLET INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LINDQUIST & VENNUM, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 30, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian E. Butler (argued), Stafford, Rosenbaum, Rieser & Hansen, Madison, WI, for plaintiff-appellant.

James E. Bartzen, Henry A. Field, Jr., Catherine M. Rottier (argued), Boardman, Suhr, Curry & Field, Madison, WI, for defendants-appellees.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and BAUER and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges.

POSNER, Chief Judge.

Nicolet Instrument Corporation brought a diversity suit for legal malpractice against its former counsel, Lindquist & Vennum. The district judge granted summary judgment for the law firm on the ground that Nicolet had failed to establish a causal connection between its loss and the law firm's alleged negligence. Wisconsin law governs the substantive issues.

Nicolet had a wholly owned subsidiary named "Nicolet Zeta Corp." that made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases