Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
The appellants' motion, denominated one to vacate a prior order dated October 9, 1992, and to renew and/or reargue the motion and cross motion determined in the prior order, was properly treated by the Supreme Court as a motion for reargument (see, e.g., Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Barbera,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.