1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 274 N.J.
  5. 274 N.J. Super. 210 (1994)
 

DE MARCO v. DE MARCO

274 N.J. Super. 210 (1994)

643 A.2d 1029

JOSEPHINE DE MARCO, PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. MARY DE MARCO, DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 13, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Glassman argued the cause for appellant (Epler & Glassman, attorneys; Mr. Glassman, on the brief).

William E. Nugent argued the cause for respondent (Nugent, Fitzgerald, McGroarty & McFadden, attorneys; Mr. Nugent, on the brief).

Before Judges R.S. COHEN, D'ANNUNZIO and WALLACE.

PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment of the Law Division dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Josephine DeMarco against her mother defendant Mary DeMarco is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Winkelstein in his written opinion of November 10, 1992 reported at 274 N.J.Super. 257, 643 A.2d 1053 (Law Div.). We are satisfied from our study of the record and the arguments presented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases