1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 135 N.J.
  5. 135 N.J. 349 (1994)
 

TRETINA PRINTING, INC. v. FITZPATRICK & ASSOCIATES

135 N.J. 349 (1994)

640 A.2d 788

IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN: TRETINA PRINTING, INC., AND HI-TECH PROPERTIES, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND JAN TRETINA AND OLGA TRETINA, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FITZPATRICK & ASSOCIATES, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. FITZPATRICK & ASSOCIATES, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TRETINA PRINTING CO., INC., HI-TECH PROPERTIES, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND JAN TRETINA AND OLGA TRETINA, INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 4, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Foster Mackey argued the cause, for appellants (Mackey & Moore, attorneys, Mr. Mackey and Gary J. Mueller, of counsel).

Robert Hedinger argued the cause, for respondent (Peckar & Abramson, attorneys, Mr. Hedinger and Caroline M. Rossi, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

This appeal and cross-appeal arise out of an arbitrator's award in a construction-management-contract dispute. The Chancery Division modified and confirmed the award. The Appellate Division reversed and vacated the award. In re Arbitration Between Tretina Printing, Inc. v. Fitzpatrick & Assocs., Inc., 262 N.J.Super. 45, 55, 619 A.2d 1037

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases