DUCKO v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORP.


433 Pa.Super. 47 (1994)

639 A.2d 1204

Wilma DUCKO and Albert Ducko, her husband, Appellants, v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION and Reedman Corp., Appellees.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed April 6, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry J. Oxman, Philadelphia, for appellants.

Keith D. Heinold, Philadelphia, for appellees.

Before WIEAND, HUDOCK and SAYLOR, JJ.


WIEAND, Judge.

In this product liability action, the sole issue is the sufficiency of the circumstances surrounding a malfunction of an automobile to establish prima facie the existence of a manufacturing defect. The trial court determined the evidence to be insufficient and entered summary judgment in favor of the manufacturer. After careful review, we reverse.

An order granting summary judgment is appropriate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases