Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that he was deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to confront a codefendant who did not testify is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, this contention is without merit. At trial, the defendant claimed that his confession was the product of physical and mental coercion and that he had been told to use the statement of the codefendant Roger Andreu as the source...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
