1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 178 Ariz.
  5. 178 Ariz. 295 (1994)
 

SHUCK v. TEXACO REFINING & MARKETING

No. 1 CA-CV 92-0149.

178 Ariz. 295 (1994)

872 P.2d 1247

Darlene SHUCK and Troy Shuck, wife and husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TEXACO REFINING & MARKETING, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E.

April 21, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margrave, Celmins & Verburg, P.C. by Lat J. Celmins, Scottsdale, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Jennings, Strouss & Salmon by Barry E. Lewin, Katherine M. Cooper, J. Matthew Powell, James M. Ackerman, Phoenix, for defendants-appellees.

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

Darlene and Troy Shuck appeal from a directed verdict granted to Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc. in this slip-and-fall case. We conclude that the trial court erred in granting the directed verdict. We also conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by granting a motion in limine to preclude Troy Shuck from testifying about statements allegedly made to him by an unidentified Texaco employee.

Facts and Procedural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases