Under the particular facts involved herein, the IAS Court, which conducted an in camera review of the documents in question, properly found that plaintiff did not meet its burden of establishing that the subject documents were protected from disclosure under the attorney-client or work product privilege (see, Spectrum Sys. Intl. Corp. v Chemical Bank,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CITY OF NEW YORK v. P.A. BLDG. CO.
201 A.D.2d 268 (1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 827
City of New York, Appellant, v. P.A. Building Company, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 1, 1994
February 1, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
