PER CURIAM.
In the five disciplinary matters numbered above, Respondent Crudup abandoned matters he had undertaken, for most of which he had been paid a retainer or some fee. He filed no response to two of the complaints and filed untimely responses to three of them. In four cases, the review panel recommended suspension; in the fifth it recommended disbarment. The responses filed did not deny the wrongdoing, but merely set forth in mitigation that Crudup is suffering...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
