Defendant asserts that his guilt of both counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1], [2] [a]) were not proved beyond a reasonable doubt since the evidence regarding identification was legally insufficient. However, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution and giving it the benefit of every reasonable inference (People v Malizia,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.