1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 336 Md.
  5. 336 Md. 125 (1994)
 

FROST v. STATE

Nos. 141, 143, September Term, 1993.

336 Md. 125 (1994)

CARL FROST v. STATE OF MARYLAND. HENRY L. KING v. STATE OF MARYLAND.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Reconsideration Denied October 5, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margaret L. Lanier, Asst. Public Defender and Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, both on brief, Baltimore, for appellants.

Richard B. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., George A. Eichhorn, III, and Alan D. Eason, Asst. Attys. Gen., all on brief), Baltimore, for appellee.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, BELL and RAKER, JJ.

CHASANOW, Judge.

The primary issue presented in these two consolidated appeals is whether Maryland Code (1957, 1993 Repl.Vol.), Article 41, § 4-612(e),1 as applied to the appellants, violates the ex post facto clauses of the United States and Maryland constitutions. See U.S. Constitution, Article I, § 10, cl. 1; Maryland Declaration of Rights, Article 17. Section 4-612(e) provides as follows: "Revocation —...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases