Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the term of imprisonment for grand larceny in the fourth degree from 2 to 6 years to 1 1/3 to 4 years; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the court allegedly restricted his cross-examination of the complainant at the hearing to determine whether the complainant was sufficiently familiar with the defendant to render a Wade hearing unnecessary (see,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.