The facts adduced by defendants on their motion to renew do not warrant vacatur of the prior orders granting plaintiff summary judgment. Whereas defendants' claim that Blitz's signature on the instruments pertaining to the 56th Street apartment was forged is supported by little more than his conclusory assertions that he was not present at the closing and did not sign the documents at issue, plaintiff came forward with the sworn affidavits of witnesses, including Blitz's...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
