MATTER OF MUNIZ v. ROTH


163 Misc.2d 293 (1994)

620 N.Y.S.2d 700

In the Matter of Robert Muniz, Petitioner, v. Nelson E. Roth, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Tompkins County.

November 21, 1994


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Golder & Golder, Trumansburg (Arthur J. Golder, III, of counsel), for petitioner. Nelson E. Roth, pro se, and Barney, Grossman, Roth & Dubow, Ithaca, and G. Oliver Koppell, Attorney-General, Albany (James E. Shoemaker of counsel), for Nelson E. Roth, respondent.


PHILLIP R. RUMSEY, J.

This CPLR article 78 proceeding was commenced to compel the respondent, Nelson E. Roth, Esq., to produce certain records and documents pursuant to Public Officers Law § 84 et seq., commonly called the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL).

The petitioner, Robert Muniz (the defendant in the case People v Muniz, Tompkins County, indictment No. 91-116), requested the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases