1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 209 A.D.2d
  5. 209 A.D.2d 228 (1994)
 

KONRAD v. 136 EAST 64TH ST. CORP.

209 A.D.2d 228 (1994)

618 N.Y.S.2d 632

Evelyn Konrad, Appellant, v. 136 East 64th Street Corporation et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 10, 1994

We agree with the IAS Court that the challenged notice is unduly burdensome and should be vacated. While the recent amendment to CPLR 3120 eliminating the requirement that documents be designated "specifically" is applicable to our review of this matter (see, Pataki v Kiseda, 80 A.D.2d 100, 102), "a vast categorical demand for documents" may constitute a "new kind of abuse of the discovery device" (Siegel, 1993 Supp Practice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases