ROE v. DOE

No. 93-1991.

28 F.3d 404 (1994)

Jane ROE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jane DOE; John Doe, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided June 29, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregg Meyers, Wise & Cole, P.A., Charleston, SC, for appellant.

John Hamilton Smith, Young, Clement, Rivers & Tisdale, Charleston, SC, argued (Stephen P. Groves, on brief), for appellees.

Before HALL and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BRINKEMA, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.


OPINION

BRINKEMA, District Judge:

The plaintiff-appellant appeals from the district court's summary judgment for defendants based on the court's holding that her personal injury action was barred by South Carolina's statute of limitations. The district court found that appellant failed to commence her action within three years of the date by which a person of common knowledge and experience would be on notice that

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases