URREA v. FLYTHE

A94A1889.

215 Ga. App. 212 (1994)

URREA et al. v. FLYTHE.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Reconsideration Denied November 14, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam R. Gaslowitz, Robert C. Port, for appellants.

Hull, Towill, Norman & Barrett, David E. Hudson, for appellee.


BIRDSONG, Presiding Judge.

Appellants/plaintiffs filed a renewal suit under the provisions of OCGA § 9-2-61, after their original suit was dismissed. The original invasion of privacy suit was filed and process served upon an employee at the defendant's residence before expiration of the statute of limitation. Defendant also was personally served with process approximately three-and-one-half months after expiration of the statute of limitation. The record does...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases