The IAS Court correctly held no factual issue as to equitable estoppel is raised since MABSTOA was under no obligation to aid plaintiffs in prosecuting their claims and, rather than misleading plaintiffs, MABSTOA and New York City Transit Authority ("NYCTA") provided several indications within the statutory period that NYCTA was the proper party defendant (Collins v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CANE v. CITY OF NEW YORK
209 A.D.2d 217 (1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 314
David Cane et al., Appellants, v. City of New York et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 10, 1994
November 10, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.