STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN WORTHY, LAMONT BRISCOE, AND WILLIE MAE WORTHY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued January 5, 1994.
Decided May 10, 1994.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Keith M. Warburton, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Harris Y. Cotton, Gloucester County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Warburton, of counsel and on the brief).
Brian S. O'Malley argued the cause for respondent John Worthy (Mr. O'Malley, on the joint letter brief).
Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney for respondent Lamont Briscoe (Carrie D. Dingle, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, on the letter brief).
William L. Bowe argued the cause for respondent Willie Mae Worthy (Mr. Bowe, on the joint letter brief).
Before Judges KING, HAVEY and ARIEL A. RODRIGUEZ.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
The opinion of the court was delivered by ARIEL A. RODRIGUEZ, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).
By leave granted1 the State appeals two orders suppressing tapes of telephone conversations between defendant and an informant.2 The conversations were recorded at the direction of a New Jersey law enforcement officer. We conclude that in those circumstances N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-4c requires prosecutorial consent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
