HURLEY v. STATE OF OR.

No. 93-35687.

27 F.3d 392 (1994)

Neil M. HURLEY, and all other similarly situated employees of the State of Oregon, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF OREGON; Fred D. Miller, in his individual capacity; Reginald B. Madsen, in his individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 17, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Hoag, Hoag, Vick, Tarantino & Garrettson, Eugene, OR, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Virginia L. Linder, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, OR, for defendants-appellees.

Before: TANG, BOOCHEVER, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


Opinion by Judge REINHARDT.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

Neil M. Hurley represents a class of employees ("Class") of the Oregon State Police. The Class appeals the district court's summary judgment ruling, which held that its members were paid on a "salary basis" and therefore were not entitled to overtime compensation. We reverse.

II. BACKGROUND

The Class includes criminalists, first sergeants, lieutenants, and captains...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases