STATE v. TACKMAN

Nos. 1 CA-CR 92-1263, 1 CA-CR 92-1297 and 1 CA-CR 92-1316.

183 Ariz. 236 (1994)

902 P.2d 1340

STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Timothy Eugene TACKMAN and Scott Alan Tackman, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Review Denied September 26, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief Counsel, Crim. Appeals Section, and Christopher E. Avery, Asst. Atty. Gen., Crim. Appeals Section, Phoenix, for appellee.

Dean W. Trebesch, Maricopa County Public Defender by James H. Kemper and James L. Edgar, Deputy Public Defenders, Phoenix, for appellants.


OPINION

McGREGOR, Presiding Judge.

In this appeal, we consider whether a superior court judge has authority to appoint a special master to recommend factual findings related to restitution and, if so, whether a defendant possesses a right to a peremptory change of the special master appointed. We have jurisdiction under Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated ("A.R.S.") sections 12-120.21 (1992), 13-4031 (1989), and 13-4033 (Supp. 1993). For the reasons that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases