GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN A/K/A CHANG HAK YUN, DECEASED, AND NAM YI YUN, GLORIA YUN, PYONG OK HWANG AND YO CHO SHIM, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, CASTLE FORD, UNIVERSAL MOTOR COACH, KIM'S MOBILE SERVICE CENTER, INC., MILLER MANUFACTURING CORPORATION AS WELL AS THEIR EMPLOYEES, STAFF, MANAGERS AND PERSONNEL RENDERING SERVICES, JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE, PETER DOE, INC., 1 THROUGH 97 (THE FOREGOING WITH THE EXCEPTION OF FORD MOTOR COMPANY, CASTLE FORD, UNIVERSAL MOTOR COACH, KIM'S MOBILE SERVICE CENTER, INC., AND MILLER MANUFACTURING CORPORATION BEING A FICTITIOUS NAME OF THE PERSONS, FIRMS OR ENTITIES WHO PERFORMED WORK OR SERVICES ON THE SUBJECT MOTOR VEHICLE IN QUESTION, BEING A 1987 FORD VAN), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND PRECIOUS LINDERMAN AND CHARLES LINDERMAN, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted March 14, 1994.
Decided May 12, 1994.
Motion for Reconsideration May 24, 1994.
Remanded June 20, 1994.
Decided September 26, 1994.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Ferdinand & Klayman, attorneys for appellants (Lane M. Ferdinand, on the brief).
Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, attorneys for respondent Ford Motor Company (Paul E. Graham, on the brief).
Dwyer, Connell & Lisbona, attorneys for respondent Castle Ford (William T. Connell, on the brief).
Newman & Boyle, attorneys for respondent Universal Motor Coach (Gary A. Cavalli, on the brief).
Hampson, Millet & Hermes, attorneys for respondent Kim's Mobile Service Center, Inc. (Robert G. Hampson, on the brief).
White, Fleischner, Fino & Wade, attorneys for respondent Miller Manufacturing Corporation (Paul F. Clark, on the brief).
Before Judges PETRELLA, BAIME and VILLANUEVA.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
The opinion of the court was delivered by VILLANUEVA, J.A.D.
Plaintiffs Gloria Yun (as administrator ad prosequendum of the estate of Chang Hak Yun)2 and Nam Yi Yun, the decedent's widow,3 appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against defendants Ford Motor Company (Ford), Castle Ford (Castle), Universal Motor Coach (Universal), Kim's Mobile Service Center, Inc. (Kim) and Miller Manufacturing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
