PEOPLE v. ARMSTRONG

Docket Nos. 171306, 171307.

207 Mich. App. 211 (1994)

PEOPLE v. ARMSTRONG PEOPLE v. RAGLIN

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided October 4, 1994, at 9:00 A.M.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, Richard Thompson, Prosecuting Attorney, Richard H. Browne, Acting Chief, Appellate Division, and Mary M. Stiel, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

John A. Basch, for Chad N. Armstrong.

Randall P. Upshaw, for Lewis F. Raglin.

Before: MURPHY, P.J., and HOOD and P. EDWARDS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The people appeal by leave granted the trial court's orders suppressing the statement of each defendant. Relying on People v Wright, 441 Mich. 140; 490 N.W.2d 351 (1992), the trial court determined that the statements were given involuntarily, because neither defendant was informed before making his statement that counsel had been retained to represent him. We reverse.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases