There is no merit to defendant's argument that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, convincing evidence of his guilt having been provided by the testimony of the undercover officer that he had an unobstructed view of defendant's face and distinctive clothing during the drug transaction and identified defendant as the seller shortly thereafter in a driveby. The trained undercover officer had ample opportunity to view defendant, the transmitted description matched...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
