1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 27 F.3d
  5. 27 F.3d 386 (1994)
 

ALARCON v. KELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 92-17045.

27 F.3d 386 (1994)

Lucila ALARCON; Raoul Hernandez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KELLER INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 17, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Rosenfeld, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Linda M. Inscoe, Latham & Watkins, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee.

Before: D.W. NELSON, BOOCHEVER, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge BOOCHEVER.

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

Workers at Keller Industries' lawn furniture manufacturing plant in Merced, California brought this action against Keller when the plant was closed and they were given only one day of notice of the closure. The workers claimed that the one-day notice did not satisfy the requirements of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act. The district court, on cross-motions for summary

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases