1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 16 F.3d
  5. 16 F.3d 394 (1994)
 

DOLLY, INC. v. SPALDING & EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC.

No. 93-1233.

16 F.3d 394 (1994)

DOLLY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SPALDING & EVENFLO COMPANIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided February 8, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Shough, Faruki, Gilliam & Ireland, Dayton, OH, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Charles J. Faruki and Donald E. Burton. Also on the brief was Richard A. Killworth, Killworth, Gottman, Hagan & Schaeff, Dayton, OH.

Christopher B. Fagan, Fay, Sharpe, Beall, Fagan, Minnich & McKee, Cleveland, OH, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Richard M. Klein.

Before ARCHER, PLAGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

Dolly, Inc. (Dolly) sued Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc. (Evenflo) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Western Division) for unfair competition and infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,854,638 (the '638 patent). On an earlier appeal in this same case, Dolly, Inc. v. Spalding & Evenflo Cos., 954 F.2d 734, 23 USPQ2d 1555 (Fed.Cir.1992), this court vacated the district court's preliminary injunction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases