1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 275 N.J.
  5. 275 N.J. Super. 134 (1994)
 

NAT. AMUSE. v. N.J. TURNPIKE AUTH.

275 N.J. Super. 134 (1994)

645 A.2d 1194

NATIONAL AMUSEMENTS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, AND HERBERT I. OLARSCH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 1, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris M. Schnitzer argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Schnitzer on the brief and reply brief).

Stanley Tannenbaum argued the cause for respondents (Sills Cummis Zuckerman Radin Tischman Epstein & Gross, attorneys; Mr. Tannenbaum of counsel; Mr. Tannenbaum and Steven R. Rowland on the brief).

Before Judges STERN and KEEFE.

PER CURIAM.

With the following caveat, we affirm the summary judgment dismissing counts two, three and four of the amended complaint substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Alvin Weiss in his opinion published at 261 N.J.Super. 468, 619 A.2d 262 (Law Div. 1992). Judge Weiss considered the impact of the Tort Claims Act "[a]ssuming arguendo" that summary judgment was not otherwise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases