CITY OF MAUMEE v. ANISTIK

No. 93-981.

69 Ohio St.3d 339 (1994)

CITY OF MAUMEE, APPELLANT, v. ANISTIK, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 25, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John B. Arnsby, Municipal Prosecutor, for appellant.

The Eidy Co., L.P.A., and Sam A Eidy, for appellee.


DOUGLAS, J.

The sole issue before this court is whether the jury instruction given by the trial judge regarding appellee's refusal to take a chemical test of her breath was improper and prejudicial to appellee. The text of the instruction objected to by appellee's counsel at trial is as follows:

"There's been evidence in this case indicating that the defendant Pamela Anistik was asked to submit to a chemical analysis of her breath to determine the concentration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases