CLEVELAND BD. OF EDN. v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 92-1431.

68 Ohio St.3d 336 (1994)

CLEVELAND BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT; ROC SYL ASSOCIATES, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 23, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Armstrong, Mitchell & Damiani, Timothy J. Armstrong and Deborah J. Papushak, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A., Fred Siegel, Steven R. Gill and Todd W. Sleggs, for appellant and cross-appellee.


Per Curiam.

The BTA found that neither party had sustained its burden of proof, and that the true value of the subject property was the amount determined by the board of revision, $7,940,020. We affirm.

Roc Syl argues that the BTA failed to set forth the reasons for its decision. However, that issue is not properly before us because it was not raised in Roc Syl's notice of appeal. Columbus Bd. of Edn...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases