MORGAN v. REPUBLIC NATL. BANK


160 Misc.2d 244 (1994)

613 N.Y.S.2d 109

Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, Respondent, v. Republic National Bank of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

February 23, 1994


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wrenn & Schmid, East Islip (James F. Murphy of counsel), for appellant. Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, New York City (Warren C. Nitti of counsel), respondent pro se.

PARNESS, J. P., MILLER and McCOOE, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

Order entered August 27, 1993 affirmed, with $10 costs.

We agree that the defendant depositary-collecting bank failed to demonstrate the existence of a genuine question of fact requiring a trial on the issue of the commercial reasonableness of its conduct in accepting the substantial ($150,000) two-party check over a facially irregular, forged indorsement of the plaintiff payee, a noncustomer of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases