IN RE PUROHIT

A94A0071.

213 Ga. App. 182 (1994)

444 S.E.2d 133

IN RE PUROHIT et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided May 10, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paine, McElreath, Rhodes & Hyder, Travers W. Paine III, James D. Hyder, Jr., for appellants.

Chilivis & Grindler, Anthony L. Cochran, Knox & Zacks, Ted H. Clarkson, Gary J. Toman, Joseph H. Huff, Mozley, Finlayson & Loggins, C. David Hailey, for appellee.


SMITH, Judge.

Jugal and Chandra Purohit appeal from the trial court's order holding them in civil contempt for violating a consent interlocutory injunction and requiring them to comply with various discovery requests. The appeal was filed in the Supreme Court, which transferred it to this court without opinion.

The record shows that Mestek, Inc., Jugal Purohit's former employer, filed suit against him seeking recovery of approximately $800,000 it claimed Purohit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases