We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiffs have failed to come forth with sufficient proof to warrant a trial on their claim for reformation of the fidelity bonds sued on herein. The party resisting pretrial dismissal of a reformation claim is required to tender a "`high level'" of proof in evidentiary form (Chimart Assocs. v Paul,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC. v. VIGILANT INS. CO., INC.
209 A.D.2d 185 (1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 278
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Vigilant Insurance Company, Inc., et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 3, 1994
November 3, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.