1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 33 Cal.App.4th
  5. 33 Cal.App.4th Supp. 6 (1994)
 

PEOPLE v. CONZELMAN

Docket No. 9008.

33 Cal.App.4th Supp. 6 (1994)

39 Cal. Rptr.2d 156

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL A. CONZELMAN, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Orange.

November 23, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Michael A. Conzelman, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Michael R. Capizzi, District Attorney, Maurice L. Evans, Chief Assistant District Attorney, Wallace J. Wade, Assistant District Attorney, Kathleen M. Harper and G. Stewart Hicks, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

CHOATE, J.

We hold that whenever radar is used in conjunction with the enforcement of a posted speed limit on a nonlocal roadway,1 the speed trap laws are invoked, giving rise to the need for a current engineering and traffic survey that justifies the posted speed. Absent the survey, we conclude that the officer is incompetent to testify as to the speed of the defendant's vehicle, even if his testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases